## Summary Axios versions `0.28.0` and later contain uncontrolled recursion in `formDataToJSON`, the helper behind the public `axios.formToJSON()` / named `formToJSON` API and the default request transform used when FormData is sent with an `application/json` content type. Applications are affected when they pass attacker-controlled `FormData` field names into this functionality. A field name with thousands of nested bracket segments can exhaust the JavaScript call stack and throw `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded`, causing request failure and, in applications that do not handle the exception or rejected promise, possible process termination. ## Impact The impact is denial of service against applications that process untrusted `FormData` field names through axios' FormData-to-JSON conversion. The vulnerable path is not reached by merely installing axios, by normal multipart `FormData` pass-through, or by ordinary axios requests that do not request JSON serialisation of `FormData`. In the default axios request, the error is produced before network I/O and returned as a rejected Promise. Direct use of `formToJSON()` throws synchronously. Server-side applications are the primary risk when remote users can submit arbitrary form field names, and the application converts those fields with `formToJSON()` or sends them through axios as JSON. ## Affected Functionality Affected APIs and paths: - `axios.formToJSON(formData)` - `import { formToJSON } from "axios"` - `lib/helpers/formDataToJSON.js` - axios default `transformRequest` when `data` is `FormData` and `Content-Type` contains `application/json` Unaffected or lower-risk paths: - Normal multipart `FormData` requests without `JSON Content-Type` - `toFormData()` object-to-FormData serialisation, which already has a `maxDepth` guard - Axios versions before 0.28.0, where this helper and public API were not present ## Technical Details `lib/helpers/formDataToJSON.js` parses a form field name into path segments with `parsePropPath()`. For a key such as `a[x][x][x]`, each bracketed segment becomes another path element. `formDataToJSON()` then calls the nested `buildPath(path, value, target, index)` function. `buildPath()` recursively calls itself once for each path segment and does not enforce a maximum depth: `const result = buildPath(path, value, target[name], index);` A key containing thousands of bracket segments, therefore, creates thousands of recursive calls. At sufficient depth, V8 throws `RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded`. Axios already applies a depth guard to the inverse serializer in `lib/helpers/toFormData.js`, where `maxDepth` defaults to 100 and exceeding it throws `AxiosError` with code `ERR_FORM_DATA_DEPTH_EXCEEDED`. `formDataToJSON()` does not currently have equivalent protection. ## Proof of Concept of Attack ```js import { formToJSON } from "axios"; const fd = new FormData(); fd.append("a" + "[x]".repeat(15000), "value"); try { formToJSON(fd); console.log("not vulnerable"); } catch (err) { console.log(`${err.constructor.name}: ${err.message}`); } ``` Expected vulnerable result: RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded The axios request transform path can also be reached before network I/O: ```js import axios from "axios"; const fd = new FormData(); fd.append("a" + "[x]".repeat(15000), "value"); await axios .post("http://127.0.0.1:1/", fd, { headers: { "Content-Type": "application/json" } }) .catch((err) => console.log(`${err.constructor.name}: ${err.message}`)); ``` Expected vulnerable result: RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded ## Workarounds Applications can avoid the vulnerable path by not converting attacker-controlled `FormData` to JSON with axios. If conversion is required before a fixed axios release is available, validate `FormData` field names before calling `formToJSON()` or before sending `FormData` with `Content-Type: application/json`. Reject keys whose parsed nesting depth exceeds the application's expected schema. For axios requests carrying untrusted `FormData`, avoid setting `Content-Type: application/json`; leaving the data as multipart FormData bypasses `formDataToJSON()`. Catching the resulting error can prevent process termination, but it does not remove the uncontrolled-recursion behaviour and should not be treated as the primary mitigation. <details> <summary>Original Report</summary> # Axios SSRF via Incomplete Loopback Detection ## CWE-918 | CVSS 7.5 (HIGH) | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L --- ## 1. Classification | CWE | CVSS Score | Severity | Type | |-----|-----------|----------|------| | CWE-918 | 7.5 (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) | HIGH | Server-Side Request Forgery | ## 2. Description ### Summary The `shouldBypassProxy()` function in Axios fails to recognise `0.0.0.0`, `::`, and `::ffff:0.0.0.0` as loopback addresses. When `NO_PROXY=localhost` is configured, requests to these addresses are incorrectly forwarded through the proxy instead of being sent directly, enabling an SSRF attack against internal services reachable via the proxy's loopback interface. ### Root Cause **File:** `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` **`isIPv4Loopback` (lines 3-8):** Only checks for `127.x.x.x` addresses by inspecting `parts[0] !== '127'`. The `0.0.0.0` address has `parts[0] === '0'`, so it falls through as non-loopback, even though on Linux `0.0.0.0` routes to the loopback interface. **`isIPv6Loopback` (lines 10-38):** Only checks `host === '::1'`. The `::` address (unspecified IPv6) also routes to the loopback, but is not recognised. **Attack Flow:** ``` isIPv4Loopback (line 3) — fails for 0.0.0.0 → isLoopback (line 44) — wraps both checks, returns false → shouldBypassProxy (line 127) — PUBLIC API, exported default → lib/adapters/http.js (line 190) — Node.js HTTP adapter ``` ### Attack Vector - **Access Vector:** Network (AV:N) - **Access Complexity:** Low (AC:L) — attacker only needs control of a URL - **Privileges Required:** None (PR:N) - **User Interaction:** None (UI:N) ## 3. Proof of Concept ### Phase 1: Logic Verification ```javascript import shouldBypassProxy from 'axios/lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js'; // Normal loopback — correctly returns true (bypasses proxy) shouldBypassProxy('http://127.0.0.1:9999/'); // → true // Vulnerable — returns false (goes through proxy!) shouldBypassProxy('http://0.0.0.0:9999/'); // → false ← SSRF shouldBypassProxy('http://[::]:9999/'); // → false ← SSRF shouldBypassProxy('http://[::ffff:0.0.0.0]:9999/'); // → false ← SSRF ``` ### Phase 2: Docker E2E Reproduction A full 3-container Docker reproduction was created and tested: - **Proxy container:** Simple HTTP forward proxy on port 8888 - **Internal container:** Internal service on port 9999 (simulates sensitive internal resource) - **Attacker container:** Runs the test script with Axios source mounted **Reproduction steps:** ```bash cd /tmp/deep-e2e docker compose up -d docker compose exec attacker node test-ssrf.js ``` **Results:** - Test 1: `127.0.0.1 + NO_PROXY=localhost` → BYPASS (correct) - Test 2: `0.0.0.0 + NO_PROXY=localhost` → VIA_PROXY (SSRF) - Test 3: `[::] + NO_PROXY=localhost` → VIA_PROXY (SSRF) - Test 4: `[::ffff:0.0.0.0] + NO_PROXY=localhost` → VIA_PROXY (SSRF) ### Phase 3: Actual Axios Client The real Axios HTTP client (v1.16.1, source tree) was tested through proxy configuration: - Axios with `proxy: { host: 'proxy', port: 8888 }` - Setting `NO_PROXY=localhost` and requesting `http://0.0.0.0:9999/` - Result: Axios forwarded the request through the proxy instead of bypassing it ## 4. Impact ### Attack Scenario 1. Attacker has control over a URL that an Axios client will request (direct input, redirect target, open redirect chain) 2. The Axios client is configured with a proxy (e.g., corporate proxy) and `NO_PROXY=localhost` to protect internal services 3. Attacker supplies `http://0.0.0.0:8080/admin` as the target URL 4. Axios sends the request through the proxy 5. The proxy resolves `0.0.0.0` → the proxy's own loopback → reaches the internal admin service on port 8080 ### Potential Consequences - **Information disclosure (C:L):** Internal service responses become accessible - **Integrity impact (I:L):** Attacker can trigger actions on internal services (if proxy supports PUT/POST/DELETE) - **Availability impact (A:L):** Limited — depends on internal service behavior ### Likelihood - **High** — proxy bypass is a common pattern in microservice architectures - **Medium** — requires attacker control of a URL (not always available) ## 5. Remediation ### Code Fix **File:** `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` ```javascript function isIPv4Loopback(host) { if (host === '0.0.0.0') return true; // ADD THIS LINE const parts = host.split('.'); if (parts.length !== 4) return false; if (parts[0] !== '127') return false; return parts.every(p => /^\d+$/.test(p) && Number(p) >= 0 && Number(p) <= 255); } function isIPv6Loopback(host) { if (host === '::1' || host === '::') return true; // ADD '::' // ... rest of implementation } ``` ### Workarounds - Add `0.0.0.0` and `::` to the `NO_PROXY` environment variable explicitly - Use `127.0.0.1` instead of `0.0.0.0` in all internal service URLs - Implement URL validation to reject `0.0.0.0` and `::` before passing to Axios
PoC: CVE-2026-38192
pluck-CMS-4.7.20-code-injection-vulnerability
PoC: cve-2024-55591-poc
Educational implementation in Go for CVE-2024-55591 (Fortinet FortiOS Authentication Bypass). Designed for security research, vulnerability assessment, and understanding WebSocket-based auth bypass mechanisms.
PoC: cve-2026-82329-jfrog-artifactory
CVE-2026-82329 JFrog Artifactory unauthenticated auth-bypass: reproducible Docker lab + URL-parameter validator PoC + patch-diff analysis
PoC: CVE-2026-82592
D-Link DIR-825M formDiskFormat stack overflow + command injection RCE PoC (CVE-2026-82592); for authorized security testing
PoC: My-Exploits
Metasploit modules, Python PoCs and throwaway Docker labs for four platform CVEs: Keycloak (CVE-2026-18963), Apache NiFi (CVE-2026-39816), HashiCorp Vault (CVE-2026-5006), HashiCorp Nomad (CVE-2026-7474).
PoC: CVE-2025-66478-PoC-Reverse-Shell
CVE-2025-66478 PoC
PoC: cve-writeups-and-pocs
CVE-2026-80724 PoC + full write-up — Linux kernel ptp/vmclock read-only mapping becomes writable (VM_MAYWRITE). Discovered, reported & fixed by Abdifatah Suruur (suruurism)
PoC: CVE-2026-79483-FastGPT-NoSQL-Injection
FastGPT Community Edition NoSQL Injection PoC (CVE-2026-79483)
PoC: givewp-cve-2026-82222-rce-lab
Authorized Docker lab and clean PoC for validating CVE-2026-82222 RCE in GiveWP 4.16.5.1 and the 4.16.7.2 fix.
PoC: CVE-2026-19745
Learn how I found my first two CVEs by pure accident.
PoC: cve-2026-23989-opencloud-lab
Reproduction lab (A/B Docker) for CVE-2026-23989 — OpenCloud / ownCloud Infinite Scale public-link scope-validation bypass in Reva
PoC: CVE-2026-21962-Blog
CVE-2026-21962 Açığı için blog sayfası oluşturdum.
PoC: PoC-and-yara-rules-of-CVE-2025-59528-Flowise-has-Remote-Code-Execution-vulnerability
poc and yara rules
PoC: root-s24-e1s
Galaxy S24 SM-S921B S921BXXSDCZB2 RAM-only KernelSU Next (CVE-2026-43499) + Root S24 app
PoC: CVE-2024-49138-SOC-Investigation
SOC investigation of CVE-2024-49138 exploitation involving brute-force activity, PowerShell execution, malicious payload analysis, privilege escalation, and incident response.
PoC: gha-lab-ee08e207a8
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-4253 (GHSA-r897-wrpm-h4vw): workflow_run command injection in gradio-app/gradio's test-functional.yml
PoC: CVE-2026-24061-Telnetd
CVE-2026-24061 GNU Inetutils Telnetd Authentication Bypass
PoC: Fortigate-SSL-VPN-Exploit-Kit
The FortiGate SSL-VPN pot of gold. CVE-2024-21762 and CVE-2023-27997. 79 working exploit clients. 53 hardware SKUs. 55 FortiOS builds.
PoC: CVE-2026-33017
CVE-2025-62593 — Ray Unauthenticated RCE Exploit is an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the Ray distributed AI compute engine.
PoC: CVE-2026-13753-poc
Poc of CVE-2026-13753
PoC: CVE-2026-82221
PoC for Unauthenticated Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in RegistrationMagic WordPress Plugin
PoC: ActiveMQ-CVE-2023-46604
Exploit POC for Apache ActiveMQ CVE-2023-46604
PoC: gha-lab-0ba60e6456
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-39700 / GHSA-45gq-v5wm-82wg (JupyterLab extension-template update-integration-tests pwn request)
PoC: CVE-2026-36130
CVE-2026-36130
PoC: CVE-2026-31321
CVE-2026-31321
PoC: postgresql-cve-2026-14662
PostgreSQL の全文検索(tsvector/tsquery)に見つかった範囲外書き込み脆弱性 CVE-2026-14662 を、修正前(18.4)と修正後(18.6)を Docker で並べて動かして検証した記録と発表資料
PoC: CVE-2026-27472-and-CVE-2026-27474
PoC for CVE-2026-27472 and CVE-2026-27474
PoC: CVE-2026-27475
PoC for CVE-2026-27475
PoC: CVE-2026-18963
Unauthenticated account takeover via reset-credentials flow bypass
PoC: CVE-2026-0768
CVE-2026-0768 - Draft or TODO
PoC: CVE-2026-82329
CVE-2026-82329 - Draft or TODO
PoC: tomcat-line-check
CVE-2026-24880: does Apache's upgrade advice actually apply to your Tomcat? Detects the fix by class presence, not version comparison. Covers 7.0/8.0/8.5/9.0/10.0/10.1/11.0 lines.
PoC: log4j2-vuln-lab
CVE-2021-44228 (Log4Shell) 漏洞复现靶场 | SpringBoot + Log4j2 2.14.1 | 3 个攻击向量 PoC 验证
PoC: CVE-2021-3493-Exploit
It's a CVE-2021-3493 Exploit written in C
PoC: gha-lab-8e9316151c
Controlled security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-1540 (GitHub Actions command injection in gradio-app/gradio deploy+test-visual.yml) — flattened snapshot of gradio-app/gradio @ f35f615e33a5dd90bfeb106b6f5dca689849fcef
PoC: gha-lab-6255f5fc33
Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2023-6572 (GHSA-gqvf-3hgp-5hxv): command injection in gradio-app/gradio's workflow_run handling of generate-changeset.yml
PoC: nextcloud-cve-2023-49792-research
A project analysis of CVE-2023-49792, inspired by a HackerOne report I have recently come across.
PoC: CVE-2026-30252
The ZenShare Suite application is vulnerable by a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, affecting web application login and recovery password functionalities.
PoC: CVE-2026-30251
A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.
PoC: gha-lab-fb32aba4a3
Authorized lab reproduction of CVE-2023-26493 (GHSL-2023-027): command injection via github.head_ref in cocos-engine's <Web> Interface check pull_request_target workflow
PoC: CVE-2018-14667_Lab_POC
Demonstration of the expression language (EL) injection vulnerability CVE-2018-14667 using the photoalbum lab under Jboss application server
PoC: weakrng-sweep
Weak-RNG stream-sweep research (CVE-2026-71851 class): PRNG schemes x seeds -> BIP39 -> victim set membership
PoC: cve-2022-29117-assessment
CVE-2022-29117 (.NET Cookie-Handling DoS) Assessment, Understanding & Questions Framework
PoC: POC-CVE-2026-0073
Security research PoC for CVE-2026-0073: ADB authentication bypass verification
PoC: gha-lab-232af4821f
Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2021-4281 (GHSA-3796-3f93-cfvx): shell command injection via PR head-branch name in .github/workflows/combine-prs.yml (snapshot of BraveUX/for-the-badge @ 409c1fda). Do not use; authorized reproduction only.
PoC: CVE-2026-82222
GiveWP <= 4.16.7.1 Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection → RCE
PoC: CVE-2026-76569
Reflected XSS via search GET Parameter in Phoca Download
PoC: activemq-cve-lab
ActiveMQ CVE-2015-5254 模拟靶场 - 用于 CVE 测试评测和 SCA 扫描演示
PoC: ghostlock-x200-app
vivo X200 设备端一键 root App（Shizuku 授权 shell 域执行，CVE-2026-43499）
PoC: gha-lab-b9842b12c0
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2021-21423 (GHSA-gg2g-m5wc-vccq): projen rebuild-bot pwn request via issue_comment
PoC: gha-lab-e4a85583c3
Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2020-36762 (GHSA-h9gr-83jq-f3xc): bash command injection via github.event.comment.body in the comment workflow of ONSdigital/ras-collection-instrument
PoC: Root-My-Galaxy
KSU installer for supported Samsung Galaxy firmware with CVE-2026-43499
PoC: CVE-2026-78905-Facebook-Account-Takeover
Social Media Infrastructure Vulnerability Research. CVE-2026-78905: OAuth token reuse and session hijacking in Facebook's Graph API.
PoC: CVE-2026-78904-Digital-Dinar-Drain
CBDC Infrastructure Vulnerability Research. CVE-2026-78904: Infinite mint and redemption bypass in central bank digital currency APIs.
PoC: CVE-2026-78903-SWIFT-Kick-to-the-Creds
Offensive Research & Exploit Development. Vulnerability research, PoC development, and offensive tooling for financial infrastructure.
PoC: CVE-2026-60004-Gitea-RCE-PoC
🫖 Direct single-target Gitea CVE-2026-60004 RCE validation PoC
PoC: CVE-2026-60004-Gitea-Validator
🫖 Contract-correlated discovery and authorized validation tool for Gitea CVE-2026-60004
PoC: cve-2026-67363-67364
Balboa form Command Injection POC
PoC: Simulation-d-attaque-BlueBorne-sur-v-hicule-connect-
Simulation complète d'une attaque Bluetooth (CVE-2017-1000251) sur un véhicule autonome via CARLA Simulator ; exploitation de la vulnérabilité BlueBorne pour accéder au bus CAN et déclencher un freinage brutal, en environnement isolé (Kali Linux VM / VMware / Python).
PoC: CVE-2026-76581-Detector
Safe passive detector for identifying WPMU DEV Dashboard versions affected by CVE-2026-76581.
PoC: htb-machine-ringdown
Detailed design & exploitation writeup for Ringdown—an original Debian/Asterisk vulnerable machine featuring CVE-2024-42365 (AMI), PJSIP pre-hash cracking, and Fail2ban POSIX ACL privilege escalation.
PoC: gha-lab-83342297e0
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-41127 (GHSA-wcjf-5464-4wq9): poisoned pipeline execution via artifact-controlled code injection in ci-failure-comment.yml. Snapshot of monkeytypegame/monkeytype @ deeea0f.
PoC: WP2Shell-Scanner
Read-only CLI to check whether a WordPress site is exposed to WP2Shell (CVE-2026-63030 / CVE-2026-60137)
PoC: phpBB-CVE-2026-48611
Automated PoC for CVE-2026-48611 — phpBB OAuth login_link authentication bypass
PoC: Project-CVE-2026-45833
CVE-2026-45833 ChromaDB
PoC: CitrixBleedCVE-2026-8452-2025-5777
CitrixBleed Exploit Tool - CVE-2025-5777 & CVE-2026-8452. Unauthenticated remote memory read from Citrix NetScaler ADC & Gateway. Steal admin session tokens, extract nsroot hashes, dump secrets, and bypass MFA. Python 3 exploit with full memory parsing.
PoC: CVE-2026-76581
CVE-2026-76581
PoC: drupalgeddon2-cve-lab
Drupalgeddon2 CVE-2018-7600 vulnerable Drupal 7 lab
PoC: shellshock-cve-lab
Shellshock CVE-2014-6271 vulnerable CGI lab
PoC: log4shell-cve-lab
Log4Shell CVE-2021-44228 vulnerable lab
PoC: CVE-2026-18741
PoC CVE-2026-18741
PoC: CVE-2026-12513
CVE-2026-12513 Vulnerability Advisory & PoC — Discovered by Huynh Kien Minh (MinhHK).
PoC: ghostlock-oppo-watch3pro
CVE-2026-43499 on OPPO Watch 3 Pro
PoC: cve-2026-82222-poc
Public PoC for CVE-2026-82222
PoC: zk-xml-probe
Static XML fixtures for authorized bug bounty testing of XML parser behaviour (CVE-2026-45071).
PoC: SOC335-CVE-2024-49138-Investigation
SOC investigation of a CVE-2024-49138 exploitation alert using log analysis, threat intelligence, and endpoint containment.
PoC: papercut-toolkit
#PaperCut CVE-2026-81578 + CVE-2026-82078 Defense Toolkit 2 3 A **defensive** toolkit to check and understand exposure to the chained
PoC: PaperCut-CVE-2026-81578-82078
Security research tool for PaperCut CVE-2026-81578 & CVE-2026-82078
PoC: vankyo-s30-bootloader-unlock
Vankyo MatrixPad S30 (Unisoc SC9863A) — Bootloader unlock via CVE-2022-38694 FDL1 method
PoC: CVE-2026-21962-Blog
CVE-2026-21962 Açığı için blog sayfası oluşturdum.
PoC: hdwebmobile-formula-pricing
WooCommerce plugin: safe formula-based product pricing, closing CVE-2026-4001's eval()-based RCE
PoC: CVE-2026-82286-gpt-crawler-Arbitrary-File-Write
CVE-2026-82286 — gpt-crawler <=1.5.1 unauthenticated arbitrary file write via outputFileName (POST /crawl). PoC + self-contained Docker lab. CVSS 8.6, CWE-22.
PoC: CVE-2026-24061-payload
A PoC exploit for CVE-2026-24061 - GNU InetUtils telnetd Argument Injection Authentication Bypass
PoC: rmgp-complete-handoff
Complete RMGP (CVE-2026-43499) workspace + experiment-state handoff for SM-A376B/A376BXXU1AZB7
PoC: CVE-2026-66384
CVE-2026-66384 - Draft or TODO
PoC: CVE-2026-33017-PoC-Reverse-Shell
CVE-2026-33017 PoC Reverse Shell
PoC: CVE-2026-33057---Mesop-Unauthenticated-RCE-PoC-and-yara-rules
CVE-2026-33057 - Mesop Unauthenticated RCE PoC and yara rules
PoC: CVE-2026-10036-speechbrain-rce
SpeechBrain < 1.1.1 checkpoint metadata RCE via unsafe PyYAML parsing of CKPT.yaml.
PoC: CVE-2025-55182-poc
I know you are probably here from Hack the Box, if so, yes this one actually works.
PoC: Project-CVE-2026-50751
IKEv1 VPN scanners, attempts a Check Point authentication-bypass exploit, and includes internal network scanning and reverse-shell features.
PoC: CTT-Enhanced-CVE-2026-46339-Exploit-Engine
A specialized Python framework that executes unauthenticated remote code execution via the 9Router Model Context Protocol (MCP) bridge by deploying a 33-layer temporal phase cascade, Riemann-Hadamard dispersion, and an 11 ns wedge filter to bypass traditional proxy and process-monitoring defenses.
PoC: Zimbra-CVE-2026-73570-Rules
Wazuh Rules for Detection Zimbra (CVE-2026-73570).
PoC: CVE-2022-46169
Cacti 1.2.22 unauthenticated command injection
PoC: CVE-2024-23897
Jenkins CVE-2024-23897 — CSRF-crumb aware PoC
PoC: CVE-2025-10952-ml-logger-AFR
PoC for CVE-2025-10952 — ml-logger unauthenticated arbitrary file read. CVSS 5.3
PoC: CVE-2026-65643
CVE-2026-65643 - Draft or TODO
PoC: cve-2023-23397-detection-lab
Detection and mitigation research lab for CVE-2023-23397 using network and endpoint security telemetry.
PoC: fastjson-cve
fastjson-cve-2026-16723
PoC: CVE-2026-23751-poc
Patched RemotingClient to exploit CVE-2026-23751 (Tungsten Automation - Kofax Capture Unauthenticated File Read/Write and SMB coercion via .NET HTTP Remoting)
PoC: CVE-2023-27350-CVE-2023-27351
CVE-2023-27350, CVE-2023-27351 - PaperCut - Draft or TODO
Get alerted for CVEs like this
Register your stack and get notified within minutes when a matching CVE drops.
Start monitoring free