The Paid Membership Subscriptions WordPress plugin before 3.0.7 does not perform capability or nonce checks on one of its payment-related AJAX actions, allowing any authenticated user with Subscriber-level access and above to disclose the payment details of any member by enumerating the payment identifier.
The Events Made Easy WordPress plugin before 3.1.4 does not verify that the requester is authorized to modify the targeted record when handling an unauthenticated data-change request, relying only on a public nonce with no per-record token or ownership check, allowing unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the personal data of any person record.
The Lightbox with PhotoSwipe WordPress plugin before 5.9.0 does not sanitise or escape a link data attribute before rendering it into the image lightbox caption in the browser, allowing users with author-level access and above (who lack the unfiltered_html capability) to store JavaScript that runs when a visitor or administrator opens the lightbox.
The FlxWoo WordPress plugin before 3.1.1 does not verify with the payment processor that a checkout session was actually paid before marking the associated order as paid, allowing unauthenticated attackers to complete WooCommerce orders without paying.
The Demi WordPress plugin before 0.0.7 stores its full-site backup archives in a publicly accessible location under a predictable filename and without access protection, allowing unauthenticated attackers to download complete backups including the site database and its user password hashes.
The GiveWP WordPress plugin before 4.16.3 does not restrict the set of available payment gateways to those enabled by the administrator, deriving it in part from request input, which allows unauthenticated users to complete donations through a payment gateway the administrator has disabled.
The 'zipfile' module would not check the validity of the ZIP64 End of Central Directory (EOCD) Locator record offset value would not be used to locate the ZIP64 EOCD record, instead the ZIP64 EOCD record would be assumed to be the previous record in the ZIP archive. This could be abused to create ZIP archives that are handled differently by the 'zipfile' module compared to other ZIP implementations. Remediation maintains this behavior, but checks that the offset specified in the ZIP64 EOCD Loc
There is a defect in the CPython “tarfile” module affecting the “TarFile” extraction and entry enumeration APIs. The tar implementation would process tar archives with negative offsets without error, resulting in an infinite loop and deadlock during the parsing of maliciously crafted tar archives. This vulnerability can be mitigated by including the following patch after importing the “tarfile” module: https://gist.github.com/sethmlarson/1716ac5b82b73dbcbf23ad2eff8b33e1
The html.parser.HTMLParser class had worse-case quadratic complexity when processing certain crafted malformed inputs potentially leading to amplified denial-of-service.
Allows arbitrary filesystem writes outside the extraction directory during extraction with filter="data". You are affected by this vulnerability if using the tarfile module to extract untrusted tar archives using TarFile.extractall() or TarFile.extract() using the filter= parameter with a value of "data" or "tar". See the tarfile extraction filters documentation https://docs.python.org/3/library/tarfile.html#tarfile-extraction-filter for more information. Note that for Python 3.14 or later
There is an issue in CPython when using `bytes.decode("unicode_escape", error="ignore|replace")`. If you are not using the "unicode_escape" encoding or an error handler your usage is not affected. To work-around this issue you may stop using the error= handler and instead wrap the bytes.decode() call in a try-except catching the DecodeError.
When using a TarFile.errorlevel = 0 and extracting with a filter the documented behavior is that any filtered members would be skipped and not extracted. However the actual behavior of TarFile.errorlevel = 0 in affected versions is that the member would still be extracted and not skipped.
Allows the extraction filter to be ignored, allowing symlink targets to point outside the destination directory, and the modification of some file metadata. You are affected by this vulnerability if using the tarfile module to extract untrusted tar archives using TarFile.extractall() or TarFile.extract() using the filter= parameter with a value of "data" or "tar". See the tarfile extraction filters documentation https://docs.python.org/3/library/tarfile.html#tarfile-extraction-filter for mor
Allows the extraction filter to be ignored, allowing symlink targets to point outside the destination directory, and the modification of some file metadata. You are affected by this vulnerability if using the tarfile module to extract untrusted tar archives using TarFile.extractall() or TarFile.extract() using the filter= parameter with a value of "data" or "tar". See the tarfile extraction filters documentation https://docs.python.org/3/library/tarfile.html#tarfile-extraction-filter for mor
During an address list folding when a separating comma ends up on a folded line and that line is to be unicode-encoded then the separator itself is also unicode-encoded. Expected behavior is that the separating comma remains a plan comma. This can result in the address header being misinterpreted by some mail servers.
The Python standard library functions `urllib.parse.urlsplit` and `urlparse` accepted domain names that included square brackets which isn't valid according to RFC 3986. Square brackets are only meant to be used as delimiters for specifying IPv6 and IPvFuture hosts in URLs. This could result in differential parsing across the Python URL parser and other specification-compliant URL parsers.
Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Project Manufactur
Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Pr
Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle Pr
Vulnerability in the Oracle Project Manufacturing product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: PJM Command Center). The supported version that is affected is V16. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle Project Manufacturing executes to compromise Oracle Project Manufacturing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Project Manufacturing acce