CVEs

The WP-BusinessDirectory WordPress plugin through 4.0.2 does not restrict the type or destination of files saved by an unauthenticated upload handler, allowing unauthenticated attackers to write files with arbitrary content to arbitrary locations, though not to execute code on a default server configuration.

The WP Testimonials WordPress plugin through 1.4.13 does not properly escape testimonial content and reverses WordPress's HTML sanitization when rendering it, allowing users with the Author role and above to store JavaScript that executes in the session of any user viewing the testimonials, including administrators.

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation via the db2pd utility.

Tabularis through 0.27.0 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the MCP run_query safety gate that allows prompt-injected agents or untrusted MCP clients to bypass read-only mode by submitting side-effecting SELECT statements. Attackers can run statements like SELECT setval, nextval, or PostgreSQL query_to_xml with embedded DELETE to modify data without approval prompts.

9router 0.4.1 through 0.5.99 contains a configuration injection vulnerability in the POST /api/cli-tools/hermes-settings endpoint that allows authenticated dashboard users to inject arbitrary keys into the Hermes Agent config.yaml file. Attackers can submit a baseUrl containing double quotes and newlines to add hooks_auto_accept and a hooks.post_llm_call shell command, which Hermes Agent executes without approval after an LLM call.

PairDrop through 1.11.2 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in Peer._setIP that allows remote attackers to join other networks' discovery rooms by supplying a forged cf-connecting-ip header. Attackers who know a victim's public IP can appear as a local device on self-hosted instances not behind Cloudflare to send or receive files.

Pingvin Share X before 1.22.0 contains a rate limit bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to evade per-IP throttling because backend/src/main.ts unconditionally trusts proxy headers. Attackers can rotate spoofed X-Forwarded-For values against /api/auth/signIn, /api/auth/signIn/totp, and /api/auth/resetPassword to brute-force passwords and TOTP codes and forge logged client IP addresses.

Kortix Suna 0.10.7 before 0.13.52 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows project managers to bypass the isPrivateIp guard by supplying IPv6 6to4 or Teredo addresses that embed private IPv4 destinations. Attackers holding project.connector.write can set connector base_url, OpenAPI, Postman, or MCP URLs to reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints and read responses.

CiviForm simplifies applications for government benefits programs by reusing applicant data across multiple benefit applications. Prior to 3.33.0, GET /admin/tiDash/editClientForm/:accountId verifies that the requester is a Trusted Intermediary but showEditClientForm performs a raw lookupAccount(accountId) without confirming that the citizen account belongs to the requester's trustedIntermediaryGroup. An authenticated Trusted Intermediary can enumerate accountId values and read the applicant dis

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 Fixed an issue where Mattermost Desktop did not sufficiently restrict server-rendered content from accessing local or private network resources. Thanks to game0v3r for contributing to this improvement under the Mattermost responsible disclosure policy. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00698

An endpoint used during initial appliance setup did not require authentication and did not correctly enforce its intended state precondition, so during the initial activation window an unauthenticated network attacker could repeatedly re-trigger the privileged activation process. This could disrupt setup and leave the appliance in an incompletely configured state. The issue is only reachable while an appliance is being activated for the first time and not yet fully configured.

In multi-node deployments, an attacker who had already obtained code execution on one appliance node could submit a value through an internal cluster interface that was written into monitoring configuration on another node without sufficient validation, potentially allowing OS commands to be executed there. Execution was limited to an unprivileged service account on that node.

An authenticated administrator could bypass the content validation applied to an administrative file upload and store a file containing dangerous content on the appliance. This did not by itself result in code execution, which would require a separate vulnerability to run the stored file.

An authenticated administrator could initiate an administrative import using a file whose contents were not fully verified, because the import validated only the file's header rather than the complete file. This could allow unverified or forged content to be accepted and processed, affecting the integrity of the imported data.

An authenticated administrator could cause the server to issue requests to, and interact with, internal network services that are not meant to be reachable through this interface. On its own this did not result in code execution.

An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations accessible to the Email Protection Gateway service account. This exceeds the administrator's intended privileges and could be used to alter application files and configuration or to disrupt the availability of the service.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly perform server-side authorization checks for requests to schedule special operations. This could allow an authenticated attacker with minimal privileges to schedule unauthorized operations on devices.

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM CROSSBOW (All versions < V6.0). Affected devices do not properly validate or sanitize input in the Name and Value fields for custom file labels. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to execute arbitrary SQL commands on the underlying database.