CVEs

The Payment Gateway for Redsys & WooCommerce Lite WordPress plugin before 7.0.2 does not verify the authenticity of incoming payment-provider notifications for one of its payment methods before marking orders as paid, allowing unauthenticated attackers to forge a payment-confirmation callback and complete their own orders without paying.

In Packetfence 13.2.0, the WebGui interface setting allows authenticated remote code execution.

In Eclipse Theia versions up to and including 1.73.1, the `@theia/filesystem` backend binds `POST /file-upload` in every filesystem-enabled deployment. The handler takes an attacker-supplied absolute path from the multipart `uri` field and calls `fs.move(tmp, target, { overwrite: true })` with no workspace confinement and no authentication. In browser (non-Electron) deployments the connection token is enforced only on WebSocket upgrades; the HTTP middleware in `@theia/core` re-issues the cookie

## Summary The `check_unsafe_options` guard can be bypassed on every guarded method (clone/clone_from, fetch/pull/push, ls_remote, iter_commits, blame, archive) by combining a single-character kwarg with `split_single_char_options=False`. The guard's candidate list omits the smuggled option, but `transform_kwarg` emits a JOINED `-n<value>` argv token that git parses as `--upload-pack=<cmd>`, yielding arbitrary command execution at the default `allow_unsafe_options=False`. This is an incomplete-f

In Eclipse Theia versions up to and including 1.73.1, the `@theia/filesystem` backend exposes HTTP file-download endpoints (`GET /file`, `GET /files/`, `PUT /files/`) that convert a client-supplied URI directly to a filesystem path and stream the file, without confining it to the workspace or any allow-listed root. In browser (non-Electron) deployments the connection token is enforced only on WebSocket upgrades; the HTTP middleware in `@theia/core` re-issues the cookie and calls `next()` without

## Summary GitPython's config-name validator only neutralizes CR/LF/NUL for the `"option"` label; it does not reject `=`, `#`, `;`, `[`, `]`, or whitespace in an **option name**. `write_section` writes the option name verbatim into the config file, so an option name such as `sshCommand = touch <cmd> #` is written as `\tsshCommand = touch <cmd> # = <value>`, which git parses as `core.sshCommand = touch <cmd>` (the trailing `#` comments out the intended value). This forges arbitrary config directi

### Summary GitPython computes the on-disk location of a submodule's separate Git directory (`.git/modules/<name>`) from the submodule's `.gitmodules` section name with no validation. Because that name is fully attacker-controlled content of a cloned repository, a malicious repository can set a submodule name to a traversal string (e.g. `../../../../home/victim/.something`) and cause GitPython to create and initialize a full Git repository at an attacker-chosen filesystem path outside the intend

Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Contextual Tasks in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

## Summary `Repo.init()` forwards `**kwargs` verbatim to `git init` with no unsafe-option guard and no `allow_unsafe_options` parameter. `git init --template=<dir>` copies `<dir>/hooks/*` into the new repo's `.git/hooks`, so an attacker-controlled `template` kwarg plants a hook that executes on the next git operation → arbitrary code execution. `--template` is already recognized as unsafe for clone (it is on `unsafe_git_clone_options`, and GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf covers the clone path), but `Repo.in

## Summary `IndexFile.from_tree`, `IndexFile.reset` (→ from_tree) and `IndexFile.merge_tree` append caller-influenced treeish strings positionally to `git read-tree` with no unsafe-option guard, no `allow_unsafe_options` parameter, and no `--` separator. `git read-tree --index-output=<file>` writes the resulting index to an arbitrary path, and last-occurrence-wins lets an injected `--index-output` override the method's internal temp path — clobbering an arbitrary file with a valid git-index blob

Use after free in Views in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)

Integer overflow in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Use after free in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, a TENANT_ADMIN can store `javascript:` URLs in the tenant `links` configuration (`website`, `imprint`, `privacyStatement`). These values are returned to the patient-facing landing page via `/api/public`, hydrated into the SvelteKit Button component, and rendered as `<a href="javascript:...">` elements without URL-scheme filtering. A patient who clicks any such link

The WPC Name Your Price for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.2.5 does not enforce its server-side price allowlist for products configured in "Select" price mode, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to add such a product to the cart at an arbitrary value below the merchant-defined allowed prices and commit a real order at that price (revenue loss / underpriced orders). This is a distinct, unfixed vector from CVE-2025-12115, whose 2.2.0 fix only addressed applying a custom price to products w

The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin before 6.2.8 does not correctly limit the number of second-factor verification attempts, tracking them against a client-supplied identifier that is reissued on every login, allowing an attacker who already knows a user's password to guess the one-time code without limit and take over the account.

Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in Codriapp Innovation and Software Technologies Inc. HeyGarson allows Fuzzing for application mapping. This issue affects HeyGarson: through 30012026.  NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported.