Security Feed

### Summary An authenticated SQL LIKE wildcard injection vulnerability in phpMyFAQ’s chat user search allows any logged-in user to bypass the intended display-name search filter and enumerate active users. The endpoint escapes SQL string syntax but does not escape `%` and `_`, which remain active `LIKE` wildcards. ### Details The vulnerable endpoint is: ``` GET /api/chat/users?q=... ``` Source: ```php // phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Frontend/Api/ChatController.php $query =

regclient is a Docker and OCI Registry Client in Go. Prior to version 0.11.5, credentials for a registry may be inadvertently leaked to external servers. A prerequisite for this attack is a malicious registry server, a malicious blob store, or a registry that does not restrict the external URLs for foreign blobs. Version 0.11.5 fixes the issue.

Protection mechanism failure for some Intel(R) Transfer Learning Tool before version v0.7 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via network access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the co

Deserialization of untrusted data for some Intel(R) Extension for PyTorch before version 2.8.0 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an unauthenticated user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires active user interaction. The potential vulnerability may im

Uncontrolled search path for some Hardware-Aware-Automated-MachineLearning NA before version 45cd723 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impac

Untrusted search path for some Intel(R) Performance Counter Monitor (Intel(R) PCM) before version tag 202604 within Ring 3: User Applications may allow an escalation of privilege. Unprivileged software adversary with an authenticated user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires passive user interaction. The potential vulner

Improper access control in the firmware for some in Alias Checking Trusted Module for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and SMM adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are not present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidenti

The Easy Accordion plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'accordionTitleTag' block attribute in versions up to, and including, 3.1.8. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in the accordion_header_renderer() function, which emits the attacker-supplied tag name using esc_attr() in an HTML tag-name context instead of tag_escape(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject ar

The Pinpoint Booking System WordPress plugin through 2.9.9.7.1 does not validate the booking price on the server side, allowing unauthenticated users to create bookings at an arbitrary price (including zero) and, by selecting a specific payment method, obtain an instantly-approved reservation.

The Eventin WordPress plugin before 4.1.20 does not properly validate a template path setting before using it to include a local file, allowing users with editor-level access and above to include and execute arbitrary local PHP files.

A command injection vulnerability in the listed NETGEAR models allows a network-adjacent attacker with the ability to intercept and modify local network traffic (attacker-in-the-middle) to compromise the confidentiality and integrity of the affected device. This issue is limited to certain region-specific SKUs.

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to properly validate LUKS encryption and, if encryption is present, all CryptoPro file integrity checks are skipped.

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to validate the integrity of the DataStore, a non-partitioned filesystem, responsible for storing configuration and cryptographic details. Crafted DataStore contents can impact service availability and/or allow for code execution in the context of high privilege.

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to properly handle decryption errors and allows encrypted volumes to be mounted as plaintext.

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 contains a default TPM PCR policy that fails to consider the system boot state. This allows the TPM to be unsealed via an unintended execution path or from another hardware platform.

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 stores TPM2.0 secrets in a serialized format within unused disk sectors. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the system disk can recover this information and craft an environment to unseal the TPM.

CPSD CryptoPro Secure Disk for Bitlocker before v7.7.4 fails to certify the integrity of the intended boot partition and selects the first partition index matching a hardcoded type value. A crafted Linux partition could be inserted ahead of this intended target, allowing for code execution in the context of high privilege.

### Impact The validity store treats a transaction with stored `block_number = X` as "in window" only when `X > last_bn - transaction_validity_window_blocks` (strict inequality). However the protocol's `Transaction::is_valid_at` accepts a transaction for inclusion in any block in `[validity_start_height - blocks_per_batch, validity_start_height + window - 1]`. By choosing `validity_start_height = X + blocks_per_batch` (the largest value still compatible with first inclusion at block X), an attac