CVE-2025-349766d ago
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established During connect(), acting on a signal/timeout by disconnecting an already established socket leads to several issues: 1. connect() invoking vsock_transport_cancel_pkt() -> virtio_transport_purge_skbs() may race with sendmsg() invoking virtio_transport_get_credit(). This results in a permanently elevated `vvs->bytes_unsent`. Which, in turn, confuses the S
Rejected reason: This CVE ID was rejected because it was reserved but not used for a vulnerability disclosure.
MailEnable versions prior to 10.54 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the FieldCc parameter of /Mondo/lang/sys/Forms/AddressBook.aspx. The FieldCc value is not properly sanitized when processed via a GET request and is reflected inside a <script> block in the JavaScript variable var CCFieldProvided. By supplying a crafted payload that terminates the existing LoadCurAddresses() function, inserts attacker-controlled script, and comments out remaining code, a remote att