## Impact An authenticated member with edit access to a shared workflow could reference another user's credential in an HTTP Request node while specifying the credential type through an expression. Because the pre-execution permission check compared the unresolved expression instead of the real credential type, the ownership check was skipped and the credential was loaded at execution time, letting the member use or exfiltrate a credential they were never granted. Exploitation required knowing
## Impact An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows could abuse crafted expressions using arrow functions to bypass the expression sandbox, triggering unintended system command execution on the host running n8n. ## Patches The issue has been fixed in n8n versions 2.31.5 and 2.32.1. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later to remediate the vulnerability. ## Workarounds If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the followi
## Impact The n8n Send Email node did not enforce that its message fields were strings, so a crafted untrusted non-string value from a workflow expression could be treated by the underlying mail library as a file path or URL. This could allow disclosure of local files on the n8n host. Exploitation requires a pre-existing active workflow with an unauthenticated webhook, valid SMTP credentials configured on the Send Email node, and untrusted input mapped directly into the text or HTML body field
## Impact Authenticated n8n users with rights to create and execute workflows could achieve code execution on the n8n host. Using the Git node, under the default `git` security settings, by staging a crafted local repository, an attacker could cause `git` to run hooks, executing arbitrary commands as the n8n process user. Both self-hosted and cloud instances are affected where authenticated users can create and execute workflows using the Git node. ## Patches The issue has been fixed in n8n
## Impact On an n8n instance with SSRF protection enabled, the MCP Client node sent requests to a user-supplied endpoint without routing them through that protection and without pinning the resolved address. An authenticated user who could create or edit a workflow could therefore cause the server to connect to internal or otherwise blocked hosts and read the responses back through the workflow, exposing internal services the SSRF protection was meant to protect. ## Patches The issue has been
## Impact Authenticated n8n users with workflow create/execute rights could use the Git node's fetch, pull, or push-tags operations to bypass the repository-path containment checks that already protected clone and push. By pointing an allowlisted remote configuration value at a local path outside the intended sandbox, an attacker could pull an arbitrary local git repository into the workspace and subsequently read its files and history. ## Patches The issue has been fixed in n8n versions 1.1
## Impact The credential "Allowed HTTP Request Domains" allowlist was intended to restrict which hosts a credential's secret could be sent to, protecting shared credentials from users who could use but not view them. Several AI/LLM nodes did not enforce this allowlist when a user-supplied base or endpoint URL was set. A low-privileged workflow editor with use-only access to such a shared credential could point one of these nodes at an attacker-controlled host and cause the credential secret to
## Impact In an n8n instance, when a validly-signed incoming token was matched to a local account by its email claim, the service did not check that the trusted key's permitted role ceiling covered that account, nor that the email claim was verified. As a result, anyone able to obtain a token accepted by one of the configured trusted keys, for example a trusted issuer that emitted unverified email addresses, could authenticate as any existing user, gaining full account control. This issue only
Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in .NET Core allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in ASP.NET Core allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Improper encoding or escaping of output in .NET allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in .NET Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Incorrect authorization in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
Stack-based buffer overflow in .NET Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Improper link resolution before file access ('link following') in .NET allows an authorized attacker to perform tampering locally.
Allocation of resources without limits or throttling in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Improper validation of specified type of input in .NET Framework allows an unauthorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Improper verification of cryptographic signature in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
Authentication bypass by assumed-immutable data in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.